Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management ; 65(5):e671, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2295111

RESUMEN

Outcomes: 1. Compare characteristics and clinical outcomes of inpatients with COVID receiving palliative care consultation (PCC) versus those who did not. 2. Elucidate evolution of PCC interventions over trajectory of successive COVID surges. Background/objectives: Palliative care (PC) teams have played an integral role in the care of critically ill patients hospitalized with COVID-19. This study describes how an inpatient, hands-on palliative care team adapted as the viral characteristics of the disease evolved. Method(s): Retrospective chart review of 2,879 patients, hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19, at a large, urban academic hospital in Washington, DC from March 2020 through March 2022. Data was collected on baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, hospital course, and palliative care consultations (PCCs). Results were compared between patients receiving PCCs and those who did not. Trends in results were studied across the region's three surge periods, "Initial" (March 2020 to June 2020), "Delta" (November 2020 to April 2021), and "Omicron" (December 2021 to January 2022). Result(s): In-hospital mortality declined over the Initial, Delta, and Omicron surges with mortality rates of 17.5% (n=137), 13.6% (n=121), and 11.2% (n=62), respectively. ICU admission rates declined, with 21.6% (n=169), 21.3% (n=189) and 17.0% (n=94) for each of the surges. 393 (13.7%) patients received a PCC, with consult rates of 12.7%, 12.1%, and 14.3% for each surge, respectively. In-hospital mortality for PCC patients was 47.8% (41.1%, 51.2%, 40.9% by surge) vs. 9.3% for non-PCC (14.2%, 7.3%, 5.6%). Majority of PCC patients had COPD in Initial (87.4%, n=83) and Delta (93.7%, n=119) surges (14.8%, n=13 for Omicron). As hospital staff became acclimated to the pandemic and the sense of urgency declined, the days to PCC increased (7.1, 8.8, 10.1 days, respectively). During the Initial surge, the primary PCC interventions were for symptom management (28.5%, n=290), psychosocial support (18.9%, n=193), and goals of care (14.9%, n=152). Psychosocial support (13.5%, n=172) and goals-of-care (6.3%, n=80) interventions declined during the less acute Omicron surge (13.5%, n=172), while symptom management increased (38.2%, n=488). Conclusion(s): The demographic profile and viral characteristics of COVID-19 patients changed over the course of the pandemic, impacting both patient outcomes and palliative care's interdisciplinary response to the needs of patients and families.Copyright © 2023

2.
Journal of Wound Management and Research ; 19(1):65-69, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2265407

RESUMEN

The medical field has undergone many changes since the start of the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. In small-and medium-sized hospitals that lack negative pressure facilities for operating rooms, it is impossible to operate on patients infected with COVID-19. As a result, many patients requiring emergency surgery experience serious complications or die. The authors performed intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) and emergency surgery in an isolation room on three patients who needed prompt surgical management for upper extremity arterial injuries but could not enter the operating room due to COVID-19 infection. Anesthesia was successful in all cases. A minor anesthetic complication occurred in one patient, who recovered spontaneously. IVRA is a relatively safe and easy method for anesthesia. More-over, since the tourniquet is inflated before anesthesia, it is well-suited for patients with arterial injury. The method is simple and therefore easy to perform in an isolation room where space and manpower are limited. IVRA can be a good option in emergency surgery for upper extremity artery injury. © 2023 Korean Wound Management Society.

4.
Journal of Clinical Oncology ; 40(6 SUPPL), 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1779693

RESUMEN

Background: TMPRSS2 is one of the two key enzymes that SARS-CoV-2 requires for its entry to the cell. TMPRSS2 is regulated by androgen receptor. It is well described Androgen Receptor Directed Therapy (ARDT) downregulates the expression of TMPRSS2. We hypothesized that the ARDT has a protective role in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) from poor outcome of COVID-19. Methods: A retrospective chart review of PCa patients with COVID-19 between March to October 2020 in the Yale-New Haven Health System was performed. Demographics, comorbidities, home medications, laboratory data, treatment, and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 were collected. ARDT was defined as the use of GnRH agonist, GnRH antagonist, or androgen receptor antagonist. This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Yale University. Results: A total of 146 (1.1%) prostate cancer cases were identified from the 13,642 cases of COVID-19. The clinical characteristics are summarized in the table. Twenty-five (17%) were on active ARDT and 121 (83%) not on ARDT (non-ARDT). The rates of hospitalization were the same: 52%, between the ARDT and non-ARDT group. Of those admitted, mean duration of hospitalization were 9.2 days (Range 1-25) and 14.9 days (Range: 2-47) in ARDT and non-ARDT groups, respectively (p=0.14). Rates of hospital stay >30 days were 0% versus 14.3% (9/63) in ARDT and non-ARDT groups, respectively (p=0.15). Intubation rates were 0% versus 11% (7/63) for ARDT and non-ARDT groups, respectively (p=0.21). Mortality rates were 8% and 13.2%, in ARDT and non-ARDT groups, respectively (p=0.47). Conclusions: The prevalence of PCa was infrequent. Despite advanced stage of the cancer in ARDT group, there was a trend toward decreased severity of COVID-19 and mortality rates compared to non-ARDT group.

5.
21st International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS) ; : 2068-2073, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1689603

RESUMEN

The spread of Covid-19 has raised the importance of unmanned and disinfection tasks, therefore the development and commercialization of service robots, such as disinfection robots, is actively underway. In addition, modern society is a personalized, where individuality is valued, with understanding and interaction of individual tastes and preferences, playing an important factor in value creation. Individual understanding starts with communication, and in this context, popularization of service robots believes that smooth interaction between humans and robots is a factor that determines success, and research is needed. In this research, the design of robots performing disinfection tasks in subway stations is studied for interactions in which robots coexist with humans and facilitate disinfection tasks. Through this work, a designed subway disinfection robot system and an appearance design considering human-centered factors are proposed. It also designed practical Human-Robot Interaction elements such as displays, voice, and laser projectors, and presented ways to utilize them to respond to possible situations in the subway. In particular, measures are shown to solve the structural problems of robots through human consideration and interaction in disinfection tasks and elevator boarding situations.

6.
Circulation ; 144(SUPPL 1), 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1634578

RESUMEN

Introduction: Thymectomy is routine during surgery for congenital heart defects to access to the heart. T cells developed in the thymus play a key role in immunity. Individuals with thymectomy in infancy have altered T cell populations suggesting early immunosenescence. Hypothesis: Adults with Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD) who underwent thymectomy in the first year of life have an altered response to influenza vaccination due to T cell immunosenescence. Methods: We recruited ACHD with early thymectomy ≤ 1 year of age (ACHD-ET;n = 12), ACHD and no thymectomy (ACHD-NT;n = 8), and healthy controls (HC;n = 14). Peripheral blood was collected prior to influenza vaccine and 4 weeks following administration. Flow cytometry of T cell subsets and intracellular cytokine staining of CD4 T cells was done following in vitro stimulation with influenza viral antigen. Results: Subject's mean age was 34 ± 10.6 years with no difference between the groups. At baseline, the median (IQR) frequency of naïve CD4 T cells was 24.7% (15.9) in ACHD-ET vs. 43.6% (16.9) in HC (P=0.01). Similarly, naïve CD8 T cells were lower with 37.5% (25.7) in ACHDET vs 62.8% (22.9) in HC (P=0.02). This also resulted in a reciprocal increase in memory CD4 and CD8 T Cells in the ACHD-ET group. The ACHD-NT was not significantly different than the other groups. The frequencies of influenza antigen-specific memory CD4 T cells expressing IFN-γ and TNF-α were significantly increased in post-vaccine blood samples compared to pre-vaccine samples across all 3 groups (P<0.05). Conclusions: ACHD-ET have a smaller population of naïve T cells, suggestive of immunosenescence. Despite this they have an equivalent cytokine response suggesting that early thymectomy does not inhibit the response to vaccination in young adulthood. Our findings support the recommendation that preventative vaccination against pathogens including influenza virus and the newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 should continue to be routinely performed in ACHD.

7.
Journal of Clinical Oncology ; 39(15 SUPPL), 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1339342

RESUMEN

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 has affected over 100 million individuals during the current pandemic. Cancer is a reported risk factor for worse outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection and its clinical syndrome COVID-19. However, risk associated with specific cancer subtypes, extent of disease, and treatment history remains unclear. Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and is treated with multiple modalities that may affect COVID-19 severity and outcomes, including surgery, radiation (RT), hormone therapy (HT), and chemotherapy (CT). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with SARS-CoV-2 and history of breast cancer at two academic centers in Los Angeles, CA between January - September, 2020. Demographic information, cancer diagnosis, treatment history, comorbid conditions, and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 were reviewed. The primary outcome was rate of hospitalization for COVID-19. Associations were evaluated for significance by chi-square test or Student's T test, with a = 0.05. Results: Our cohort included 61 patients with history of breast cancer. 19 (31.1%) required hospitalization and 3 (4.9%) died from COVID19. Median age was 61 years. 44% of patients were White/Caucasian, 37.7% Hispanic/Latinx, 8% Black/African American, 5% Asian, and 5% were of another race. 87% of patients had local or regional disease and 13% had distant metastases. 53% of patients had ever received CT historically, 66% HT, and 53% RT. 25% of patients received cancer treatment (surgery, CT, or RT) within 90 days of COVID-19 diagnosis. 38% were on HT at time of COVID-19 diagnosis. Patients with prior RT were more likely to be hospitalized from COVID-19 than those with no prior RT (44% vs 14%, p = 0.02), as were patients with 2 or more comorbidities (p = 0.01). In addition, there was a trend toward lower hospitalization rates for patients on HT [24% vs. 42% (p = 0.17)] and a trend toward higher hospitalization rate for non-white ethnicity [35% vs. 25% (p = ns)]. Extent of disease, history of CT, or receipt of any cancer treatment (e.g. surgery, RT, CT) within 90 days of COVID-19 diagnosis were not associated with hospitalization rate. Conclusions: In our diverse cohort of breast cancer patients with COVID-19 a history of RT and presence of multiple comorbidities were both associated with increased risk of hospitalization, while a history of HT was not. Further investigation is needed to validate these findings in larger cohorts. These findings may inform recommendations for breast cancer patients during the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

8.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management ; 61(3):695-695, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1141041
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA